Misattribution of Memory > 게시판

• 목록
• 답변
• 글쓰기
• 게시판 리스트 옵션
  • 수정
  • 삭제

In psychology, the misattribution of memory or source misattribution is the misidentification of the origin of a memory by the person making the memory recall. Misattribution is more likely to occur when individuals are unable to monitor and management the influence of their attitudes, towards their judgments, on the time of retrieval. Misattribution is divided into three parts: cryptomnesia, false recollections, and supply confusion. It was originally noted as considered one of Daniel Schacter's seven sins of Memory Wave Method. Cryptomnesia is a type of misattribution. It involves the unconscious affect of memory that causes current ideas to be wrongfully attributed as novel. In different phrases, individuals mistakenly consider that they're the original generators of the thought. When cryptomnesia arises in literature or scholarly ideas it is usually termed 'inadvertent plagiarism', inadvertent because the subject genuinely believes the idea to be their own creation. Inadvertent plagiarism takes two kinds. The first includes the plagiarizer regenerating a previously seen thought, but believing the concept to be novel.

Within the second form, the plagiarizer recalls the concepts of different creator's as their own. For instance, a person may falsely recall creating an idea, thought, or joke, not intentionally partaking in plagiarism, but however believing to be the original supply of memory. False reminiscences are recollections that people imagine and recall as true that, in fact, by no means occurred. Typically, individuals kind false reminiscences for particulars of occasions after hearing others mistakenly report information about an occasion. For example, members who watch a video of against the law featuring a blue automobile however hear the automotive misleadingly known as white after the very fact may create a false memory of a white car current at the scene of the crime, reasonably than a blue one. False recollections can vary from small particulars about an occasion to total occasions that never happened, comparable to being lost in a crowded purchasing mall as a toddler.

Supply confusion is an attribute seen in several people's accounts of the identical occasion after listening to people speak in regards to the scenario. An example of this would be, a witness who heard a police officer say he had a gun after which that witness later says they saw the gun. Understanding the source of 1's recollections is important to memory processes needed for daily residing. Reminiscences come up both from perceptual experiences and from one's ideas, feelings, inferences, and imagination. Source monitoring idea postulates that memory errors happen when perceptual data is incorrectly attributed as being the source of a previous expertise. This may occasionally happen as a result of one occasion shares the traits of one other source. When a person has many sources of perceptual information about an event, their mind is well in a position to evoke a memory of that occasion, even if they didn't expertise it, thus creating a misattributed memory. In a single particular case of supply confusion, a female rape survivor falsely accused a memory physician of being her rapist.

In this case, the physician had made a tv appearance seen by the feminine survivor prior to her attack. The girl misattributed the physician's face with that of her attacker. An extra example of supply confusion entails Ronald Reagan. In this instance, Ronald Reagan tells a narrative a few heroic pilot to whom he personally awarded a medal. Nonetheless, he was really recalling the story line from a theatrical production entitled "Wing and a Prayer". Nevertheless, he strongly believed that he was concerned within the medal process to this struggle hero. Cryptomnesia is a source-monitoring error Memory Wave Method in which individuals typically have problem determining whether an idea was internally generated or skilled externally. Individuals sometimes misattribute the creation of a novel thought or thought as their own, when in actual fact they are retrieving it from a previous experience. Some individuals fail to ascertain memories with enough detail to generate a source attribution, inflicting a misattribution of memory to the incorrect supply.